A community organization is joining forces to assist parents amid and following a high-conflict divorce or parental separation who are facing challenges with Visitflation, Parental Alienation, and Blind Systemic Wedges.
Think of it like when you and your friends have a disagreement about how to take care of your pet. It can become complicated and overwhelming, but with the help of this community organization, the solution can be easier to find and make everyone happy, including your pet.
CLU has published a new blog about protecting families during high-conflict divorce or separation. The blog, "The BAV Policy: How to Protect Yourself and Your Children," provides useful tips and information on how to manage the rising cost of legal services and the growing gap between average people and high-priced lawyers. You can also learn about ways people are advocating for relief from the anti-competitive behavior in certain industries and understand the 'Prolific Blind Alien Visitflation (BAV) Pay Gap Theory' and its impact.
Don't let Visitflation, Parental Alienation, and Blind Systemic Wedges take control of your life. Protect yourself and your children by reading the latest blog from CLU and taking charge of your family's future.
Most have heard about eggflation
In 2022, egg prices rose significantly at a rate of 60% over the past year due to the ongoing avian influenza epidemic in the U.S. which has resulted in the loss of 43 million egg-laying hens. This shortage of eggs during the holiday season when demand is high, resulted in several consecutive weeks of record-high egg prices. However, costs are expected to decrease in the coming weeks as egg-laying flocks are restored. Additionally, other food items such as margarine and butter have also seen large price increases. Overall, food inflation has risen by 10.4%.
As we've seen, food prices have risen significantly over the last year. But there's another trend that's starting to cause concern for many families. It's called Visitflation, and it's having a devastating impact on low-income families trying to secure visitations during and after a divorce. This phenomenon is characterized by the rising costs of legal services and a widening gap between expensive lawyers and what the average person earns.
Have they heard about Visitflation?
We've all seen similar heart-wrenching news stories like these. In 2021 the ABC 17 news story highlights Visitflation in a legal battle between a mother, Cortney Nolan, and her ex-husband about custody of their children. Nolan claims that she was ordered to see a licensed psychologist, Dr. James Reid, for a $50,000 mental assessment during the custody battle (2021).
It is difficult to assess how many innocent victims are impacted by Visitflation, as it can take many forms and may not always be reported or recognized. However, studies and news stories have highlighted the problem and its impact on low-income families and individuals who may not have the resources or knowledge to navigate the legal and financial aspects of their circumstances.
Judge Judy Scheindlin, a former family court judge, is calling for family courts to be open to the press in order to bring transparency and accountability to the system. In some cases, even the deaths of children are being covered up by the system. She believes that cameras in the courtroom will open up the family courts so that people can see the kind of justice being delivered by this expensive court system.
Thomas Doheny, 51, was found dead in his jail cell on Friday, November 17, 2017, facing immense child support payments which he could no longer afford according to Dempsey, 2019. He had been held at the jail since November 1, 2017, when he was taken into custody in contempt of court. He was in court dealing with a divorce filed against him in 2014. The child support payments exceeded $7,700 and maintenance payments were $11,500 monthly for 16 years. According to the source, Judge Michael Coppedge, who presided over the case, failed to consider the information provided by Doheny and made it impossible for him to afford child support payments.
As we delve deeper into the issue of Visitflation, the harsh reality becomes all too clear. Families are being left feeling helpless and hopeless, facing the devastating consequences of unregulated systemic Visitflation. It's a tragedy that low-income families are struggling to access representation and are falling victim to exorbitant attorney fees. But it's not just financial struggles that are taking a toll on families, as we see from the devastating example of a young Robinhood app partner named Alexander Kearns taking his own life due to a wrongful negative balance similar to Visitfltion.
The note he left behind raises a haunting question, "How was a 20-year-old with no income able to get assigned almost a million dollars worth of leverage?" It's impossible to fully understand the complex factors that lead to suicide, but it's clear that financial inflation played a role in this tragic loss of life. We must take action and seek peer remedy to end this form of Visitflation and protect families from its devastating effects.
Robinhood is a stock trading app that allows users to buy and sell stocks and other securities using their mobile devices or personal computers. It is popular among younger investors and those with limited funds because it offers commission-free trading and a user-friendly interface.
The issue mentioned in the passage is that the app displayed a negative $730,000 cash balance in red, but it may not have represented an actual loss of funds. Instead, it may have been a temporary balance until the stocks underlying his assigned options actually settled into his account. This can be confusing for users and may have led to the user's misinterpretation of the negative balance as an actual loss of funds.
In Missouri, during the first quarter of 2021, about 5,500 independent parents have filed a dissolution of marriage case with children involved. This amounts to roughly 22,000 people per year. 80% of these cases involve either unrepresented or underrepresented parents, who have to navigate complex systems such as paywalls, digital e-filings, and virtual hearings. This can lead to pain and suffering for these parents, as they struggle to understand the system and get their voices heard. This disparity in legal representation can also impact children and families negatively, causing emotional and financial challenges. Research has shown that when one parent has more resources and representation in court, they are less inclined to share or play fairly. Studies have also found that parents without representation often feel pained and unsupported, as they struggle to make their voices heard in the legal system.
According to a recent report, legal services have experienced an average inflation rate of 3.92% per year between 1986 and 2022. This means that the prices for legal services have increased by 299.03% during this time period. This significant rate of change indicates a significant inflation in the cost of legal services. To put this in perspective, if you were to purchase legal services for $10,000 in the year 1986, it would cost you $39,902.98 in 2022 for an equivalent purchase. This is an important issue that may affect many individuals and businesses who rely on these services
According to data, we have seen a less than 1.4 percent increase in wages and salaries over this period of time. To put this into perspective, if someone was earning $10,000 in 1986, they would be earning only $12,240 in today's dollars. This indicates a slow growth in wages and salaries and raises concerns about the economic well-being of working individuals.
As we've seen, the cost of legal services has seen significant inflation in recent years, rising nearly 300% over the past 36 years. But while the financial burden of legal proceedings may be on the rise, questionable, risky or increaingly out of reach for most, there is another, equally troubling issue that affects families across the country: Parental Alienation. This phenomenon, in which one parent actively works to turn a child against the other parent, can have devastating effects on families and the children already over taxed in the middle. Let's take a closer look at this heartbreaking issue.
The Cost of Connection
A mom, once so naive,
Holds on to what she believes,
That her family's what really counts,
But with cash, relationships bounce.
$50,000 to $1,000,000,
The cost to keep a healthy connection,
But what happens when that's not enough,
When the state's got all the power and stuff?
Visitflation, a term too real,
The mountain that kids face uphill,
Regulated by us, the voters,
But we turn our backs, they suffer.
What's next, we ask, with teary eyes,
Will we ignore the press's cries?
We don't regulate, we don't control,
And suffer the consequences as a whole.
Explanation of the concept of Parental Alienation
Parental Alienation, or PA as it's commonly called, is a phenomenon where one parent, often times in the midst of a custody dispute, actively works to turn their child or children against the other parent. Sadly, it's like a drug dealer attempting to manipulate a child into going against the efforts of the police by convincing them to sell drugs on the streets. PA can take the form of badmouthing the other parent, limiting contact with them, or even outright lying to the child about the other parent.
The effects of parental alienation can be devastating for the child and the targeted parent. Children who are exposed to parental alienation may suffer from emotional distress, behavioral problems, and even mental health issues. Additionally, the targeted parent may experience feelings of loss, sadness, and powerlessness.
It's important to note that parental alienation can occur in any type of family structure, whether the parents are divorced, never married, or even still together. It is not limited to any specific race, religion, or socioeconomic group.
It's crucial that we, as a society, become aware of this issue and take steps to address it. This includes educating ourselves and others about the signs of parental alienation, and supporting those who are affected by it. We must also work towards creating a legal system that is equipped to handle cases of parental alienation and to protect the best interests of the child.
CLU urges you to stay informed and to take action in any way you can to help combat this serious problem from more the one perspective.
The answer lies in perpectives
The problem of Parental Alienation and how it affects families during and after a divorce
PA can happen in various ways, such as by making negative comments about the other parent, withholding affection, or preventing the child from spending time with the other parent.
The problem of parental alienation is that it can have a severe impact on the emotional and psychological well-being of the child, as well as the relationship between the child and the alienated parent. Children who are exposed to parental alienation may develop feelings of anger, guilt, or confusion, which can lead to emotional and behavioral problems later on in life.
During a divorce, parental alienation can also make the process more difficult and stressful, as it can create conflict between the parents and prolong the legal proceedings. In some cases, it can even lead to one parent being denied custody or visitation rights.
After a divorce, parental alienation can continue to affect the child and the alienated parent, potentially causing long-term emotional damage to both. It is important for parents to understand the negative impact of parental alienation and to take steps to prevent it from happening. This may include seeking the help of a therapist or counselor, attending parent education classes, or working with a mediator or parenting coordinator to develop a co-parenting plan.
As the topic of parental alienation has shown us, the effects of a divorce can be far-reaching and damaging to families. But what happens when the very system meant to help these families is the cause of the problem? This is where the concept of Double Blind Systemic Wedges, or DBSWs, comes into play. DBSWs are invisible barriers that exist within our legal and social systems, and they can have a profound impact on marginalized groups. As we delve deeper into this topic, we'll explore the ways in which DBSWs perpetuate inequality and the steps we can take to break down these barriers and create a more just society.
A Child's Betrayal
A sad girl, so young and small,
Groomed by one parent, to the other's downfall,
After a separation, her world turned upside down,
As the adults in her life start to act like clowns.
Grandparents too, join the manipulative game,
Turning the child against the other's name,
Using her love as a weapon to wield,
Leaving her to navigate a terrible battlefield.
What must it feel like, to be used in such a way?
To have your love turned against you every day,
To feel like you're caught in the middle of a war,
Wondering what you're fighting for.
Thankfully, there are those who do care,
CLU, who won't turn their backs and stare,
They work to prevent this gloom and doom,
Repairing broken bonds before they're consumed.
It's never too late to take a stand,
And offer a child a helping hand,
So let's work to end this cycle of despair,
And show these children that we truly care.
Double Blind Systemic Wedges, or DBSWs
Double Blind Systemic Wedges (DBSWs) is a phenomenon where one party in a two-party contract, court proceeding, or legal action is effectively turned against the other party. DBSWs are like big walls that make it impossible for families to understand and navigate the legal system. Just like how a wedge is something that can split things apart, these DBSWs can make it hard for families to stay together and make good decisions during tough times like divorce. It's like a big puzzle that's always missing and hard to figure out. Sometimes, people in power make it even harder to solve intentionally or unintentionally.
Why did the double blind wedges go into the forest?
To chop each other down
and see if it would make a sound
or if St Louis grass would come back to life!
These wedges refer to the systemic biases and barriers that make it difficult for families to navigate the legal system. These biases can include things like a lack of understanding of cultural norms, a lack of resources for low-income families, and a lack of representation for marginalized groups. These wedges can have a significant impact on the outcome of a legal case and can lead to unfair and unjust results for the families involved. DBSWs happen legally, socially, academically, and even financially.
The University of Chicago Press discusses the concept of "oppressive double binds," which are double binds that exist as a result of oppression. These are situations where no matter what you do, you're stuck because of oppressive structures. The author explains that these double binds can limit your ability to make choices and can hurt you, even if you're trying to resist oppression. They give examples of double binds in philosophy and politics. The purpose of the article is to understand how these double binds work and how they impact people who are trapped in them.
DBSWs can make it so that one parent is seen as the good one and the other is seen as the bad one. This can lead to not being able to spend as much time with their child and having to do what the good parent wants. It can make the child feel like they have to choose between their parents, just like a fish out of water feels different from a fish in water.
Socially, a DBSW can occur when one parent is deemed the "good" parent and the other is seen as the "bad" parent. This can lead to alienation, where the "bad" or "nocustodial" parent is not allowed to spend as much time with their child as they would like, and is often subject to the "good" or "custodial" wishes no matter what. It can lead to social isolation, academic isolation, extra corricular isolation, and judicial isolation, just like several fish out of water feels different from several fish in water. All spaces where the child feels like they have to choose between their "bad" or "living" parents.
Internally, DBSW can occur when a child feels like they have to take sides between their parents. This can lead to feelings of guilt, anger, and confusion. It can also lead to feelings of abandonment, especially if the child feels like one parent is not there for them.
Alienations are almost mandated internally when one parent is seen as the "good" parent and the other is seen as the "bad" parent. This can lead to chronic alienation, where the "bad" parent is not allowed to spend any time with their child. It can also lead to chronic social isolation, where the child feels like they have to choose between their isolated feelings and socializing.
It appears that some professions are being made more profitable, and people's lives are already predetermined as to what they can or cannot do before they are born.
The BlindAlienVisitflation (BAV) policy
Many concerned citizens have expressed deeply troubled feelings by their reports of "Quadruple Blind Systemic Wedges," or BAV mandate.
As an all-natural peer group, we don't have access to individual social experiences, but in general, those who've experienced BAV or "Quadruple Blind Systemic Wedges" may express feelings of frustration, anger, and helplessness as they feel their lives have been impacted negatively due to this phenomenon. They may feel like they're being caught in a never-ending game of chance, similar to the childhood game "Spin the Tail on the Donkey," where they are constantly at a disadvantage and the outcome is uncertain. These individuals may speak out against the perceived opponent, or system and advocate for change to protect themselves and their families from the devastating effects of BAV.
It seems like an impossible situation for parents to be caught in, where they are facing revolving alienation episodes just for trying to co-parent well. Or expensive quadruple-blind systemic experiences when they can't co-parent.
The result of this quadruple blind, they say, is a painful and devastating experience for all involved, especially the children. They hope but know that our government and the legal system can't find a way to provide support and representation for these families, so people say their grief lingers forever.
Financially, a DBSW between parents can also occur when future finances do not align with past agreements due to changed circumstances, leading to difficulties in providing for the child and potentially impacting their future financial stability.
Imagine you and your friend made a deal to take care of your pet together. You both agreed to split the cost of food and toys for the pet. However, as time goes by, your friends can no longer take care of the pet. Now, you have to take care of the pet all by yourself and pay for everything by yourself. This is like the Double Blind Systemic Wedge that some people experience with their money and taking care of their children. Just like taking care of a pet became more expensive for you, it can become more expensive for people to take care of their children when circumstances change.
Now let's say you and your friend have a pet together and you both agreed to take turns feeding it every day. But one day, your friend's family moves away and they can't co-parent the pet anymore. So now, you and your friend have to go to a special place called a court to talk to a judge about who will feed the pet and how it will be done in the future. But because your friend is far away, they can't be there to talk to the judge, and they can't tell the judge what they want. This is like a "quadruple blind" situation facts because they can't see your life in real-time, and the judge can't understand how to make future facts caring for the pet match up with past facts. This can make it very difficult for the judge to make a fair and good decision about who will continue feeding the pet and how it will be done in a new agreement or court order.
It is important to remember that double and quadruple blinds can happen to any family and that it is possible to navigate these challenges with the help of a therapist or counselor. It is also important to remember that the child's well-being should be the top priority in any divorce or custody agreement.
In a worst-case scenario, Visitflation policy or mandate can result in extreme financial burden on parents who are going through high conflict divorce or blended family impasses. It can cause a significant increase in the cost of visiting with their children, making it difficult or even impossible for them to spend time with their children. This can lead to feelings of frustration and sadness for the parents and harm to the relationship with their children. It can also put additional stress on the children who may feel torn between their parents. Furthermore, if the parents are unable to afford the increased cost, they may not be able to see their children at all, causing a rift in their relationship and potentially long-lasting damage. This can harm the mental and emotional well-being of both the parents and children involved.
It is truly heart-wrenching to think of the innocent children and families who are caught in the grip of the blind circumstances. The challenges they face in terms of raising their kids, maintaining relationships, and even their overall well-being can be incredibly difficult. It is especially devastating for those with special needs, who may struggle even more to stay connected and get the support they need following a high-conflict legal separation. The thought of any child going through such a traumatic experience is enough to bring tears to one's eyes. It is truly a call to action for society to do better for these families.
As the story of DBSWs unfolds, we are introduced to another aspect of the challenges faced by families navigating life after divorce: BlindAlienVisitflation. This term refers to the small but significant number of innocent people who are impacted by visitations that are inflationary, parental alienation, and various DBSWs. These individuals often find themselves caught in the middle, struggling to make sense of the complex and ever-changing landscape of post-divorce life. But as we delve deeper into the experiences of those affected by BlindAlienVisitflation, we begin to see the human cost of these systemic biases and barriers and the resilience of the human spirit in the face of adversity. So read on, and let's explore the impact of BlindAlienVisitflation on those caught in its grip.
Explanation of sufferages
As we delve deeper into the complexities of divorce, we come across a term that encapsulates the devastating effects that can be inflicted upon innocent parties caught in the crosshairs: BlindAlienVisitflation. This term refers to a small number of individuals who are impacted by a combination of factors, including Visitflation, PA, and various DBSWs. These individuals are often caught in a web of legal and emotional turmoil that can have long-lasting and compacting consequences on their social, emotional, and financial well-being. The stories of these individuals serve as a harsh reminder of the need for compassion and understanding in navigating the treacherous waters of divorce.
BlindAlienVisitflation refers to the systemic biases and barriers that make it difficult for families to navigate life after a divorce. These biases and barriers can have a significant impact on the social, emotional, academic, and financial well-being of both parents and children.
For example, let's take the case of Jane, a single mother who was recently divorced. Despite having a joint custody agreement with her ex-husband, Jane has struggled to maintain regular visitations with her children due to a combination of factors, including her ex-husband's refusal to comply with the agreement and court delays. As a result, Jane has been forced to spend more money on legal fees and has experienced emotional distress as a result of being separated from her children.
This is just one example of the many innocent people who are being impacted by BlindAlienVisitflation. It is a serious issue that must be addressed typically by lawmakers and the legal system to ensure that families can navigate life after a divorce without being subjected to unnecessary barriers and biases. However, because the number of individuals impacted by this issue is relatively small, it is not widely acknowledged or recognized in the political or social spheres. As a result, those affected have primarily had to rely on self-help strategies to cope with its effects.
In conclusion, BlindAlienVisitflation is a serious issue that is impacting the well-being of families across the country. We must bring awareness to this issue and work together to find solutions that will help families navigate the often-complicated legal system.
It is difficult to define a specific person or data that is at the center of gravity of Visitflation, Parental Alienation, and limitless Double Blind Biased Systemic Wedges combined, as these issues can affect a wide range of individuals and families in various ways. However, some possible examples of individuals who may be particularly affected by these issues include low-income parents or caregivers who are struggling to secure visitations with their children during a divorce or custody battle, as well as children who are experiencing Parental Alienation and are being torn between the love and loyalty towards both parents. Additionally, these issues can also have a devastating impact on the mental and emotional well-being of these individuals and families and can cause long-term harm. Data that could be collected to better understand the extent of these issues would include research on the number of cases of Parental Alienation and Visitflation in the family court system and the impact on the children and parents involved, as well as data on the social and economic factors that contribute to these issues.
Quadruple Blind Systemic Wedges
Quadruple Blind Systemic Wedges,
Make life harder for those at the edges.
Legal cases, social divide,
Academic and financial ties,
All plagued by biases and disparities,
Unjust results for families everywhere.
Oppressive double binds at play,
In politics, philosophy, every day.
Choice limited by oppressive structures,
Hurtful impact for those who suffer.
Alienation, isolation, and confusion,
All outcomes of this systemic illusion.
Chronic alienation for some families,
No co-parenting, only legal formalities.
Expensive experiences and financial strains,
A difficult journey, full of pains.
Lives impacted, hope dwindling,
Quadruple Blind Systemic Wedges, never ending.
From Survival to thrival: Adaptive kids who become Lawstars
At CLU, we also uncover stories of children who have been able to adapt and even thrive in the face of these challenges, becoming successful in their careers and personal lives. These children are known as "Lawstars" and serve as an inspiration to others facing similar struggles.
Once, in a land not so far away, three local kids were dealing with the harsh realities of BAV as mandated policy. They were struggling with the emotional toll it was taking on their families, and they felt like they were stuck in a never-ending cycle of alienation and financial strain. But, little did they know, they were about to become Savvy Superheroes and break free from the grip of BlindAlienVisitflation!
The first kid, let's call him Timmy, was dealing with the financial stress of his parent's divorce. He was worried that he wouldn't be able to afford college, and he was feeling the weight of the world on his shoulders. But, Timmy was determined to break free from the grip of BlindAlienVisitflation. He started working hard in school and even took on a part-time job to save up for college. With his hard work and determination, Timmy was able to get a scholarship and attend his dream school.
The second kid, we'll call her Samantha, was dealing with alienation from her father. She was feeling lonely and isolated, and she didn't know how to fix it. But, Samantha was not one to give up easily. She reached out to a therapist, who helped her understand her feelings and how to communicate with her father. With the help of her therapist, Samantha was able to reconnect with her father and rebuild their relationship.
The third kid, we'll call him Alex, was dealing with the emotional toll of his parent's divorce. He was feeling angry and resentful, and he didn't know how to cope. But, Alex was a creative kid, and he channeled his emotions into writing. He wrote a play about his experiences with BlindAlienVisitflation, and it was a huge success! With the help of his writing, Alex was able to process his emotions and come to terms with his parent's divorce.
In the end, Timmy, Samantha, and Alex all broke free from the grip of BlindAlienVisitflation and became Savvy Superheroes in their own right. They all had different ways of coping, but they all found a way to thrive despite the challenges they faced. They proved that, with determination and a little bit of creativity, anyone can break free from the grip of BlindAlienVisitflation and become a winner!
What if relief was in sight for those who desperately need it to survive but they didn't know where to look?
Once upon a time, there was a father named Clumsy Crusader. He was a loving and dedicated dad to his two children, but he found himself in a difficult situation. His marriage had fallen apart and he was going through a difficult divorce.
As the custody battle raged on, Clumsy Crusader found himself struggling to provide for his kids emotionally and financially. He felt like he was stuck in a never-ending cycle of court appearances, lawyer fees, and endless paperwork.
But what was most difficult for Clumsy Crusader was the impact the divorce was having on his children. They were struggling emotionally and academically, and he could see that they needed help.
Clumsy Crusader had always struggled with the grip of BAV, the systemic biases and barriers that made it difficult for families to navigate life after a divorce. Despite his best efforts, he found himself constantly struggling to maintain a healthy relationship with his kids and provide for them financially.
He spent countless hours researching ways to break free from the grip of BAV, but he always hit a dead end. He reached out to lawyers, counselors, and even other parents who had gone through similar experiences, but no one seemed to have any answers for him.
As time went on, Clumsy Crusader's relationship with his kids became increasingly strained. He saw them less and less, and when they did visit, he could tell that they were resentful and distant. Despite his best efforts to be there for them, he felt like he was losing them.
As the years went by, Clumsy Crusader's financial situation continued to deteriorate. He found himself unable to make ends meet, and he was forced to sell his home and move into a small apartment. He struggled to find work and was often forced to rely on government assistance.
Despite all his efforts, Clumsy Crusader never broke the grip of BlindAlienVisitflation. He never found the relief he so desperately needed for his kids and himself. He spent the rest of his days alone, living in poverty and regretting all the opportunities he missed to be there for his children. His story serves as a warning to other parents that sometimes, despite our best efforts, it's not possible to overcome the systemic biases and barriers that can tear families apart.
From Survival to Thrival: The Lawstars of CLU
Champions for children, they stand tall,
Uncovering stories of those who faced it all,
From divorce, alienation, and financial strain,
Adaptive kids who didn't let anything restrain.
Timmy, Samantha, and Alex, they fought,
Breaking free from the grip, no longer caught,
In a never-ending cycle of pain and strife,
Becoming Lawstars, living a successful life.
But there are those who couldn't break free,
Like Clumsy Crusader, lost and filled with debris.
Despite his efforts, he couldn't find relief,
And his story is one of pain and grief.
CLU, the champions for children, they understand,
That overcoming BAV is no easy demand,
But with determination, creativity, and support,
Surviving to thriving, Lawstars themselves can report.
In 2022, a phenomenon known as "eggflation" swept the nation, as the cost of eggs skyrocketed due to a shortage in supply. As people scrambled to find affordable eggs, they began to realize the true cost of blindfolded operations and the impact it has on individuals and families.
Why did the chicken refuse to lay any more eggs?
Because it didn't want to contribute to eggflation and risk getting alienated like a skunk!
But eggflation was just the tip of the iceberg. As the year progressed, a new term emerged: "Visitflation." This referred to the rising costs of visitations and the barriers that families faced when trying to navigate the legal system during and after a divorce.
Why did the parents stop driving their cars?
To avoid getting caught in a "viscous" cycle of vistflation and ending up smelling ostracized like a skunk!
At the center of Visitflation were the stories of individuals and families who were blindfolded and trying to navigate a system that was stacked against them. They were like the person trying to pour water on a plant while another person held it, both blindfolded and unable to see the bigger picture.
These individuals and families were often left to fend for themselves, with little support or guidance. The system was designed to benefit those who were already vested in the double-blind operations, leaving the rest to struggle and pay the price.
Why did the pioneers decide to team up with the United CLU parents
to adapt for self-preservation from the dangerous crusader lifestyles of Visitflation
and parental alienation? Because they knew that together, they could conquer any obstacle
and blaze a trail to better families of the future!
But there were also stories of hope. Like the Savvy Superhero, a local kid who, despite the odds stacked against him, found a way to break free from the grip of Visitflation. And the Clumsy Crusader, a father who, despite his best efforts, was never able to escape the grip of Visitflation and the devastating impact it had on his children.
As the nation began to wake up to the reality of Visitflation, more and more voices began to speak out against it. "Eggflation for endlessly cracked eggs? Nonsense!" they cried. "Visitflation for endlessly cracked double-blind lives and deals? Nonsense! Visitflation on trial!"
These stories serve as a reminder that blindfolded operations and double-blind systems have real-life consequences. It's time for us to take off the blindfolds and take a hard look at the systems that are holding us back, so that we can create a better future for everyone.
True Crime on trial: Visitflation
Eggflation for endlessly cracked eggs?
Imagine it's trial day in the case of Visitflation (a.k.a. Clumsy Crusader) versus Savvy Superhero.
"Ladies and gentlemen, gather round as we take you to the next chapter in our epic battle of the ages - the showdown between Clumsy Crusader's Visitflaton and Savvy Superheros. But this time, it's not just a physical battle, it's a mock legal one. That's right, folks, Visitflation is on trial and the stakes have never been higher.
Imagine the courtroom as the dramatic music of "We're not going to take it!" blares in the background, signaling the start of the trial. Savvy Superhero, the champion of the innocent, stands tall and determined, ready to take on Clumsy Crusader and his army of Visitflation supporters.
On the other side, Clumsy Crusader, the villainous mastermind behind the Visitflation epidemic, tries to hide behind his team of lawyers, but the evidence is stacked against him.
As the trial unfolds, we'll see the victims of Visitflation take the stand, telling their stories of how Clumsy Crusader's actions have affected their lives. We'll see the evidence presented, the witnesses called, and the arguments made. But in the end, it will be up to the jury to decide the fate of Visitflation. Will Savvy Superhero prevail and bring justice to the innocent? Or will the Clumsy Crusader continue to thrive in his Visitflation empire? The verdict is still out, but one thing is for sure, it's going to be one wild ride. So grab your popcorn, folks, and let's get ready to put Visitflation on trial!"
Opening statement for the accuser:
"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, today we stand before you to address a grave injustice - Visitflation. This nefarious force, personified by the defendant, Clumsy Crusader, has robbed our society of its values, our rights to visit our loved ones, and even our most basic necessities - like eggs for breakfast.
But make no mistake, the evidence will show this is not a trial of Clumsy Crusader alone. It is a trial of our society's complacency in the face of such atrocities. It is a test of our willpower to stand up for what is right and just. And that is where we, the Savvy Superhero, come in.
We are here to fight for our values, our rights, and our eggs. We are here to advocate for the victims of Visitflation and by the end of this trial you'll hold those responsible accountable for their actions.
This is your Perry Mason moment, where the truth will be revealed before your very eyes. We implore you to listen with open minds and hearts and to deliver a verdict that serves justice for all. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, of the jury."
The opening statement for the defense:
"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, my client Clumsy Crusader is not the villain in this case. The phenomenon of Visitflation is a complex issue that cannot be blamed on one individual. My client is being used as a scapegoat for larger societal problems such as the high cost of legal services and a confusing legal system.
We ask that you approach this case with an open mind and consider all the evidence presented before making a decision. My client should not be held responsible for something that is out of his control. Thank you."
The prosecution calls their first witness, a single mother who struggled to afford the high attorney fees and retainer costs associated with her divorce. She testifies about how the high costs prevented her from being able to secure regular visitations with her children and how the confusing legal system and jargon used by attorneys made it difficult for her to understand and navigate the process.
The defense attorney attempts to discredit the witness, questioning her about her own financial responsibility and suggesting that the issues she faced were not caused by the legal system but by her own choices.
The prosecution then calls a low-income father as a witness, who testifies about how he was unable to secure legal representation due to a lack of right to counsel for low-income families. He also speaks about how the expensive law school grads and their jargon made it difficult for him to understand and advocate for himself in court.
The defense attorney continues to try to discredit the witnesses, suggesting that their issues were not caused by the legal system but by their own personal circumstances.
Now the judge says, "The court calls to the stand, a witness for the prosecution, Mrs. Smith."
Mrs. Smith takes the stand and begins to testify about her experience trying to navigate the legal system in order to gain visitation rights with her children after her divorce. She describes how the high cost of legal fees and the confusing legal jargon made it nearly impossible for her to understand and advocate for herself. She also mentions how the lack of right to counsel for low-income families left her feeling helpless and hopeless.
The defense attorney cross-examines Mrs. Smith, trying to downplay her experience and place blame on her own lack of understanding of the legal system.
"The court calls to the stand, the next witness for the prosecution, Mr. Johnson."
Mr. Johnson takes the stand and testifies about his experience as a low-income individual trying to gain visitation rights with his children after a divorce. He shares how the high cost of legal fees and the lack of right to counsel left him feeling like he had no voice in the legal system. He also mentions how the confusing legal jargon made it impossible for him to understand and advocate for himself.
The defense attorney again tries to downplay the witness's experience and place blame on the individual rather than the systemic issues at play.
As the trial continues, more witnesses take the stand to testify about their experiences with Visitflation and the impact it has had on their families and their lives. The jury listens carefully to each testimony, weighing the evidence presented before them.
As the trial comes to a close, the prosecution and defense give their closing arguments. The prosecution argues that the high costs and confusing legal system make it difficult for parents to secure regular visitations with their children and that these issues are systemic and in need of change. The defense argues that the problems faced by the witnesses were not caused by the legal system but by their circumstances and lack of responsibility.
Finally, the judge instructs the jury to consider the evidence presented and deliberate on a verdict. The jury convenes to deliberate on the case.
"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury," the judge exclaims, "we have heard from both sides on this very monumental issue and it is now time for you to deliberate and reach a verdict. The prosecution has presented evidence of the high costs associated with accessing divorce court justice and the detrimental effects it can have on families, particularly low-income families. The defense, on the other hand, has argued that the phenomenon known as "Visitflation" is not a criminal act, but rather a result of a complex legal system and economic factors beyond the control of the defendant.
"As you deliberate," the judge continues, "consider the evidence presented, the testimony of the witnesses, and the arguments of both sides. Keep in mind the burden of proof lies with the prosecution and the defendant is innocent until proven guilty.
The judge then turns to the jury and says, "You may now retire to the jury room to begin your deliberation." The jury exits the courtroom and the judge turns to the court clerk and says, "We will reconvene in one hour for the jury's verdict."
"All rise," the bailiff called out as the judge entered the courtroom. The jury filed in, looking somber and serious. The judge turned to the foreman of the jury and asked, "Have you reached a verdict?"
"We have, Your Honor," the foreman replied.
"And what say ye?" the judge asked, leaning forward in his seat.
The foreman cleared his throat and announced, "We find the defendant, Clumsy Crusader, guilty of Visitflation."
There were gasps and murmurs throughout the courtroom as the judge thanked the jury for their service and ordered the defendant to be remanded into custody. The prosecution team hugged and celebrated their victory, while the defense team looked on in stunned silence.
The judge turned to the courtroom and said, "This case serves as a reminder of the devastating consequences of Visitflation and the importance of protecting the rights of families and children. Let this be a lesson to all of us to fight for fairness and justice for all."
With that, the judge banged his gavel and the courtroom began to empty, as the families affected by Visitflation finally felt a sense of closure and justice.
The importance of readdressing the chronic issue of Visitflation yourself
Protecting yourself and your children from the devastating effects of Visitflation, Parental Alienation, and opportunity costs of Double Blind Systemic Wedges is monumental. Learn how to navigate the rising cost of legal services and the widening gap between expensive lawyers or law school degrees and the average person. Discover ways to fight back against anti-competitive behavior in industries and gain a better understanding of the 'Prolific Greedy BlindAlienVisitflation (BAV) Pay Gap Theory' and its impact on inflation and elimination. Read our latest blog, "The BlindAlienVisitflation Policy: How to Protect Yourself and Your Children" for valuable insights and advice on protecting your family during difficult times.
Discover more ways to fight back:
- Make or sign a change.org petition asking Congress to sponsor a bill to relieve Visitflation.
- CLU's sponsor offers paid plans with ultra safety 💯⚖️💯 measures built-in to secure your life and family's future against Parental Alienation and Visitflation here.
Don't let Visitflation issues control your life!
- If you or someone you care about are experiencing Visitflation, Parental Alienation, or BAV and don't know where else to turn, then CLU has a free self-help guide, download the free .pdf by clicking here:
Download PDF • 19.74MB
-Or, get the guide on Amazon in ebook format here.
The SEC is responsible for monitoring securities exchanges, brokers, and dealers. To address the issue of eggflation, the SEC has no authority, but for cases of Visitflation, it may be necessary to report instances of unequal contract margins or disparities in derivative contracts, rather than just relying on CLU or letting it go while suffering the consequences like victims of stock fraud, Charles Ponzi or Bernie Madoff. The SEC can also receive reports of non-compliant S&E brokers and dealers here.
FAQ - Where can I get help or my kids adaptive recognizable access?
Visitflation: The Wedges That Keep Us Apart
Kids today face a world of strife;Where healthy food is out of sight;And toxic traits run rife and wild;In boys and girls, men and child.
Files that don't care, and those that do;Are in short supply, and hard to view;With Parental Alienation at hand;Wedges are driven into the sand.
Eggflation keeps the tooth fairy at bay;And Santa struggles to find his way;In a world of broken marriages and divorce;Where understanding takes a back course.
Kids are left to fend for themselves;With little help, and few remedies on the shelves;But there is hope, if we just try;To put aside our differences and not rely.
On Visitflation and other harmful ways;To keep our kids from brighter days;Let's break the wedges, and build a bridge;Of love and understanding, let's rid the fridge.
Of junk food and toxic traits;And build a future that truly waits;For all our kids to thrive and grow;With empathy and love, let's start the show.